ADVICE
Final diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) should be made with a structured clinical interview, including a thorough mental status examination and functional assessment.
MANAGEMENT
Y-BOCS Management Summary
Score |
OCD Severity |
Suggested Action |
0–7 |
Subclinical |
No formal intervention required, monitor periodically |
8–15 |
Mild |
Consider psychoeducation and monitoring; brief CBT if functional impact present |
16–23 |
Moderate |
Recommend CBT with exposure and response prevention (ERP) |
24–31 |
Severe |
CBT + pharmacotherapy (SSRIs); consider referral to specialist |
32–40 |
Extreme |
Urgent referral to OCD specialist; consider intensive outpatient or inpatient program |
CRITICAL ACTIONS
- Y-BOCS is a severity rating tool and should not replace comprehensive psychiatric assessment.
- Functional impairment and patient distress levels must guide treatment urgency and modality.
- Screen for co-occurring conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, or tic disorders.
FORMULA
0–40 score, with 0–4 points for each of ten questions (5 for obsessions, 5 for compulsions).
FACTS & FIGURES
Each question is rated based on:
- 0 = No symptoms
- 1 = Mild
- 2 = Moderate
- 3 = Severe
- 4 = Extreme
Items assess time spent, interference, distress, resistance, and control over obsessive and compulsive symptoms separately.
Obsessions subtotal (0–20) + Compulsions subtotal (0–20) = Total Y-BOCS score (0–40)
EVIDENCE APPRAISAL
The Y-BOCS was developed by Goodman et al. (1989) and is considered the gold-standard measure of OCD severity.
It demonstrates high inter-rater reliability (r = 0.98), test-retest reliability (r = 0.88), and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.89).
The scale has been validated in clinical trials and has shown strong correlation with functional impairment in OCD.
The updated Y-BOCS-II addresses some limitations of the original, including improved response scales and expanded symptom dimensions, while maintaining robust psychometric properties (Storch et al., 2010).